{"id":2910,"date":"2021-11-02T18:37:50","date_gmt":"2021-11-02T18:37:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/?page_id=2910"},"modified":"2021-12-14T20:06:05","modified_gmt":"2021-12-14T20:06:05","slug":"cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">(en remplacement de <em>Canada c. Cameco Corporation<\/em>, 2020 CAF 112)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Les motifs et le jugement de la Cour canadienne de l&rsquo;imp\u00f4t dans&nbsp;<em>Agracity Ltd. c. La Reine<\/em>, 2020 CCI 91 sont  port\u00e9s en appel devant le Tribunal \u00e9cole Bowman en droit fiscal.<\/p> <p>\n  Les questions en litige en appel sont : <\/p>\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n  <li>(a)  Pour fonder une all\u00e9gation d&rsquo;artifice, doit-il toujours y avoir un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de  tromperie? <br>\n (b) En supposant qu&#8217;un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de tromperie  soit requis, quel est, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, le niveau de tromperie requis? <br>\n  (c) Les transactions conclues par AgraCity Ltd.  et NewAgco Inc. constituaient-elles un artifice? <\/li>\n  <li>(a)  Les alin\u00e9as 247(2)a) et c) de la <em>Loi  de l&#8217;imp\u00f4t sur le revenu<\/em>, L.R.C. (1985), ch. 1 (5e suppl.) (la \u00ab&nbsp;<strong>Loi&nbsp;<\/strong>\u00bb) s&#8217;appliquent-ils pour  red\u00e9finir les modalit\u00e9s des op\u00e9rations en cause? <br>\n  (b) Les alin\u00e9as 247(2)b) et  d) de la Loi s&#8217;appliquent-ils pour requalifier les op\u00e9rations en cause? <\/li>\n<\/ol> \n<p>\n  <strong>Toutes  autres questions en litige<\/strong> soulev\u00e9es \u00e0 la Cour canadienne de l&rsquo;imp\u00f4t ne sont pas port\u00e9es en appel.<\/p> \n<p>\n  Le  concours Bowman est destin\u00e9 \u00e0 promouvoir la plaidoirie portant sur des  questions de fond du droit fiscal, et non sur des questions relatives au droit  administratif ou \u00e0 la norme de contr\u00f4le. Les participants doivent pr\u00e9senter de  tr\u00e8s br\u00e8ves observations \u00e9crites et renvoyer les juges \u00e0 leur m\u00e9moire  lorsqu&rsquo;ils \u00e9noncent oralement la norme de contr\u00f4le applicable. Nous avons  inform\u00e9 les juges que la norme de contr\u00f4le n&rsquo;est pas en cause et leur avons  conseill\u00e9 de s&rsquo;abstenir de poser toute question relative \u00e0 ce sujet. <\/p> <p>\n  La cause en appel \u00e9tant une cause r\u00e9elle, les  m\u00e9moires des parties doivent donc \u00eatre des \u0153uvres originales, et non une copie  ou une simple imitation de documents judiciaires d\u00e9j\u00e0 d\u00e9pos\u00e9s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u00c9claircissements sur la cause en appel<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>Les participants sont-ils autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 argumenter\/aborder les faits \u00e9tablis par le juge du tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance de la CCI ? autrement dit, les participants sont-ils autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 plaider en faveur d\u2019une \u00ab erreur de fait manifeste et dominante \u00bb ?<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Bien que la norme de contr\u00f4le applicable ne soit pas en cause, les participants peuvent se r\u00e9f\u00e9rer aux faits \u00e9tablis par le juge de premi\u00e8re instance de la Cour canadienne de l&#8217;imp\u00f4t et aux conclusions tir\u00e9es et pr\u00e9senter des arguments pour expliquer pourquoi la d\u00e9cision de la Cour canadienne de l&#8217;imp\u00f4t est correcte ou non. Cependant, les arguments des participants devraient \u00eatre ax\u00e9s sur la r\u00e9solution des questions \u00e9nonc\u00e9es dans la cause en appel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\" start=\"2\"><li><strong>La question 1(c) demande si les transactions conclues par AgraCity Ltd. et NewAgco Inc. constituent une artifice. Nous pensons que c&#8217;est une hypoth\u00e8se s\u00fbre que &#8220;NewAgco Inc.&#8221; fait r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de la Barbade, et non \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaine du m\u00eame nom impliqu\u00e9e dans les transactions de 2005.<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Nous confirmons que cette hypoth\u00e8se est correcte.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\" start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Nous aimerions savoir si les plaideurs sont cens&eacute;s r&eacute;pondre aux questions concernant :\n\t<\/strong>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha\">\n\t<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha\">\n<li><strong>Les r&egrave;gles du fardeau de la preuve dans les litiges fiscaux, examin&eacute;es par la Cour dans AgraCity (2020 TCC 91), paragraphes 100-105 ;<\/li>\n<li>Les appelants se sont-ils conform&eacute;s aux lois et r&egrave;glements f&eacute;d&eacute;raux applicables, dont il est question &agrave; l&#8217;alin&eacute;a 78(ix).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<li>Les participants ne sont pas cens&eacute;s r&eacute;pondre aux questions li&eacute;es au fardeau de la preuve dans les litiges fiscaux, et nous nous efforcerons de veiller &agrave; ce que les juges s&#8217;abstiennent de poser de telles questions<\/li>\n<li>Les participants ne sont pas cens&eacute;s r&eacute;pondre aux questions li&eacute;es &agrave; ce probl&egrave;me.\n   <\/li>\n  <\/ol>\n <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(en remplacement de Canada c. Cameco Corporation, 2020 CAF 112) Les motifs et le jugement de la Cour canadienne de [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":193,"featured_media":0,"parent":2664,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2910","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022 - Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022 - Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"(en remplacement de Canada c. Cameco Corporation, 2020 CAF 112) Les motifs et le jugement de la Cour canadienne de [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-14T20:06:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/winner-1-1-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1706\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/cause-en-appel\\\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/cause-en-appel\\\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\\\/\",\"name\":\"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022 - Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-02T18:37:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-14T20:06:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/cause-en-appel\\\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/cause-en-appel\\\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/cause-en-appel\\\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/home\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cause en appel\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/fr\\\/cause-en-appel\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman\",\"description\":\"6 mars \u2013 7 mars 2026 \u00b7 Pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par Dentons\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Dentons\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/10\\\/Dentons_Logo_Purple_RGB_150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/10\\\/Dentons_Logo_Purple_RGB_150.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":46,\"caption\":\"Dentons\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022 - Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022 - Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman","og_description":"(en remplacement de Canada c. Cameco Corporation, 2020 CAF 112) Les motifs et le jugement de la Cour canadienne de [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/","og_site_name":"Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman","article_modified_time":"2021-12-14T20:06:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1706,"url":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/winner-1-1-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/","url":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/","name":"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022 - Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-11-02T18:37:50+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-14T20:06:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/cause-en-appel-du-concours-bowman-2022\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/home\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cause en appel","item":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/cause-en-appel\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"CAUSE EN APPEL DU CONCOURS BOWMAN 2022"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/","name":"Concours national de plaidoirie en droit fiscal Donald G.H. Bowman","description":"6 mars \u2013 7 mars 2026 \u00b7 Pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par Dentons","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/#organization","name":"Dentons","url":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Dentons_Logo_Purple_RGB_150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Dentons_Logo_Purple_RGB_150.png","width":240,"height":46,"caption":"Dentons"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/193"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2910"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2934,"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2910\/revisions\/2934"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2664"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bowmantaxmoot.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}